Economic crisis is a big shuffle. When the shuffle ends, what leaves is going to be a luxury industry core with smaller size but stronger power. The latest survey shows that in order to survive the Depression, brands either adapt the policy of small profits and quick returns or insist on superior quality and brand image, relying on the support of loyal customers and riding out a storm.Lately Oprah Winfrey was Criticized for Wearing pandora
Because the price factor is more sensitive during economic depression, most of brands can reduce the price to pass difficult time. Would You Wear pandora jewellery uk ? However, there are minority brands to choose their positions, do not compromise with dangerous current situation. Do You Know How pandora jewellery Prevail? A Horrible Number! Chanel, Louis Vuitton and Hermès are representatives. The price of the famous Chanel Link Check handbag is so high without falling, and in bad situation, rises rather than fall. Louis Vuitton by virtue of their own superiority in the Asian market has maintained a steady trend of profitable insists on not discounting have created a high-quality image. Hermes`s high price avoids a large part of the risk for Hermes, at the same time, limited customized tradition services can help it save unnecessary pre-investment. Fashion blog Bagsnob.com claimed: “I believe that true luxury consumers are not subject to the economic crisis, because they are not likely to earn a monthly salary.” Victoria who is crazy about Birkin bags is the best proof.
Conversely, as middle-class consumers turned to look for inexpensive alternatives, the mid-range brands like Coach Daoshi won their own spring. The “W Score” report, Coach with a score of 92.7 won first place in the competitiveness of the throne. Williams said, [on the basis of displaying products with higher price, Coach launches a number of styles with prices to people referring to consumption psychology in depression. That measure is quite useful. I think that the success of this company lies in closely following the customer’s needs.”
Of course, being in the same markets, even the profitable brands could not avoid the impact of the economic environment. Chanel cut its 200 staff in the end of the year, and Hermès CEO Patrick Thomas clearly showed, “We are encountering crisis, and the whole luxury industry can not turn a blind eye to it. To dream Hermès be staying out of the crisis is impossible.” In this case, money must be put in the right place. While reducing the expense, Chanel didn’t cut their series such as “Paris - Moscow” Advanced Hand Workshop series and the “Paris - Venice” early spring vacation series. Moreover, two films reflecting the history of Coco Chanel [Coco avant Chanel” and [Coco Chanel & Igor Stravinsky” were also released in 2009. Chanel maintained a high media exposure from beginning to end, and the seven workshops they bought implied that the quality of their products were consummate.
The brands which pursued non-discount did not only limit to the high-end luxury goods. The outdoor brands Timberland still decided to expand its high-end lines Timberland Boot Co…in such a bad case, this brand relied on the loyal customers who they accumulated many years. The Abercrombie & Fitch even braves the risk of loss and refuses to cut prices. According to a report, the company’s net loss was as high as 26.8 million U.S. dollars, compared with last year in May sales fell by 23.5 percentage points. We spent a lot of years to build the brand, and our competitiveness in quality, style and shopping experience, rather than price. “A & F CEO Mike Jeffries said the brand. Gary Williams gave positive comments on the measure of A&F:” Although they are in difficulty, from the perspective of brand image, they are still very competitive.”